- Over One Million Iraqi Deaths Caused by US Occupation
- Security and Prosperity Partnership: Militarized NAFTA
- InfraGard: The FBI Deputizes Business
- ILEA: Is the US Restarting Dirty Wars in Latin America?
- Seizing War Protesters’ Assets
- The Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act
- Guest Workers Inc.: Fraud and Human Trafficking
- Executive Orders Can Be Changed Secretly
- Iraq and Afghanistan Vets Testify
- APA Complicit in CIA Torture
- El Salvador’s Water Privatization and the Global War on Terror
- Bush Profiteers Collect Billions From No Child Left Behind
- Tracking Billions of Dollars Lost in Iraq
- Mainstreaming Nuclear Waste
- Worldwide Slavery
- Annual Survey on Trade Union Rights
- UN’s Empty Declaration of Indigenous Rights
- Cruelty and Death in Juvenile Detention Centers
- Indigenous Herders and Small Farmers Fight Livestock Extinction
- Marijuana Arrests Set New Record
- NATO Considers “First Strike” Nuclear Option
- CARE Rejects US Food Aid
- FDA Complicit in Pushing Pharmaceutical Drugs
- Japan Questions 9/11 and the Global War on Terror
- Bush’s Real Problem with Eliot Spitzer
t seems that the days of using YouTube as #1 media to distribute documentaries, videos and presentations about the truth of Israel and Zionist and their horrific war-crimes history and terrorism profile, has come to END.
Yesterday, it was announced that YouTube officially connected to the infamous ADL as partner to "Fight Against Hate."
YouTube has reached out to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for its expertise in dealing with hate on the Internet. In one outgrowth of that partnership, the League is now a contributor to YouTube's newly launched Abuse & Safety Center, where users are empowered to identify and confront hate, and to report abuses.
A new law working its way toward passage in Germany has journalists worried. Certain provisions, they say, could eliminate the ability for reporters to protect their sources. Still, the measure is likely to go into effect early next year.
It has been called the "Big Brother" law in the German media due to its provisions allowing online and telephone surveillance. The Interior Ministry in Berlin describes it as a necessary step to protect the country from the dangers of international terrorism.
The year was 2000, and Cox Newspapers had about 30 people in Washington to cover the new Bush administration. Eight years later, a similar transformation is under way, the stakes heightened by two foreign wars and the worst economic collapse in decades, but Cox will not be there to cover it. Cox, the publisher of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Austin American-Statesman and 15 other papers, announced this month that its Washington bureau would simply close its doors on April 1.
Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, said Monday she will work to restore the Fairness Doctrine and have it apply to cable and satellite programming as well as radio and TV.
The Fairness Doctrine required TV and radio stations to balance opposing points of view. It meant that those who disagreed with the political slant of a commentator were entitled to free air time to give contrasting points of view, usually in the same time slot as the original broadcast.
The doctrine was repealed by the Reagan administration's Federal Communications Commission in 1987, and a year later, Rush Limbaugh's show went national, ushering in a new form of AM radio.
A Reagan legacy: repealing fairness. How wonderful.
An Iraqi television station on Monday demanded the immediate release of one of its journalists who caused a furore when he hurled shoes at visiting US President George W. Bush.
Muntazer al-Zaidi jumped up as Bush was holding a press conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Sunday, shouted "It is the farewell kiss, you dog" and threw two shoes at the US leader.
The report released today on the probe, titled "Deception and Distrust" and led by Reps. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.), Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, found Martin suppressed information and manipulated data to serve his agenda.
Martin has been criticized by FCC staff members for pushing his proposals to loosen media ownership rules and requirements for a la carte pricing of cable television through such tactics as suppressing agency studies that do not support his agenda.
Page 80 of 97