President Barack Obama's choice to take charge of the war in Afghanistan Tuesday called "significant growth" of the Afghan army and national police the key to his strategy, but the annual cost of building and maintaining the existing Afghan force is already roughly four times larger than the entire Afghan economy.
Army Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal's testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee, which is considering his nomination to lead U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, suggested that the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan is likely to cost American taxpayers and NATO member nations billions of dollars for many years.
New U.S. Afghan strategy will cost billions, take years
An excavator stood on top of what used to be a house in Deir Qanoun Al-Nahr,...
Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao said Thursday the U.S. is pausing a $14 billion arms sale...
The heavy burden the US endured to defend Israel has caused the shortage of interceptors that...
Hezbollah’s drone capabilities are limiting 80 percent of Israeli assaults on southern Lebanon, according to a...
