A federal appeals court ruled in July that the Copyright Royalty Board, a panel of administrative judges who set the rate broadcasters pay for copyright licenses, was unconstitutional because of the way its panelists are appointed and the job protections they are given.
The ruling could impact the work of thousands of administrative judges dissecting the details of regulations at U.S. government agencies from the Federal Communications Commission to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Such judges' hearings replace traditional trials when regulations are at issue. They hear more cases than the entire judicial branch combined, said Arti Rai, a professor at Duke University School of Law.
The Trump administration is using civil rights laws to wage a campaign against the University of...
An appeals court ruled Monday that Lisa Cook can remain a Federal Reserve governor, rebuffing President...
Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah says she has been fired from the newspaper over social media...
