A federal appeals court ruled in July that the Copyright Royalty Board, a panel of administrative judges who set the rate broadcasters pay for copyright licenses, was unconstitutional because of the way its panelists are appointed and the job protections they are given.
The ruling could impact the work of thousands of administrative judges dissecting the details of regulations at U.S. government agencies from the Federal Communications Commission to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Such judges' hearings replace traditional trials when regulations are at issue. They hear more cases than the entire judicial branch combined, said Arti Rai, a professor at Duke University School of Law.
This brings our live coverage of the final New York mayoral debate to a close.We will...
The University of Arizona has become the seventh US university to reject a Trump administration proposal...
The University of Virginia (UVA) has become the latest institution to agree to the Trump administration’s...
Paul Ingrassia, President Donald Trump’s embattled nominee to lead the Office of Special Counsel, told a...
