A federal appeals court ruled in July that the Copyright Royalty Board, a panel of administrative judges who set the rate broadcasters pay for copyright licenses, was unconstitutional because of the way its panelists are appointed and the job protections they are given.
The ruling could impact the work of thousands of administrative judges dissecting the details of regulations at U.S. government agencies from the Federal Communications Commission to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Such judges' hearings replace traditional trials when regulations are at issue. They hear more cases than the entire judicial branch combined, said Arti Rai, a professor at Duke University School of Law.
The Supreme Court on Thursday appeared skeptical of a ruling by a federal appeals court that...
In a post written, unusually, in the third person on Donald Trump’s Truth Social account, the...
Lawmakers in Alabama passed legislation that could lead to the prosecution of librarians under the state’s...
