Social networking has changed the balance of political power, he said, “but everything we know about technology tells us that the current forms of social network communication, despite their enormous current value for politics, are also intensely dangerous to use. They are too centralized; they are too vulnerable to state retaliation and control.”
In January, investors were said to have put a value of about $50 billion on Facebook, the social network founded by Mark Zuckerberg. If revolutions for freedom rest on the shoulders of Facebook, Mr. Moglen said, the revolutionaries will have to count on individuals who have huge stakes in keeping the powerful happy.
“It is not hard, when everybody is just in one big database controlled by Mr. Zuckerberg, to decapitate a revolution by sending an order to Mr. Zuckerberg that he cannot afford to refuse,” Mr. Moglen said.
By contrast, with tens of thousands of individual encrypted servers, there would be no one place where a repressive government could find out who was publishing or reading “subversive” material.
Russian overnight strikes across Kharkiv region killed three people in Chuhuiv and injured at least 15...
The end of the 60 Minutes broadcast as we know it has sickened millions of longtime...:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(999x0:1001x2)/kristen-welker-meet-the-press-091123-6-6e558db5019447e2908efbb4812ee1e9.jpg)
President Trump abruptly ended his interview with NBC News’s Kristen Welker on Friday, after the two...
