What does a company do when there's anecdotal evidence that two of its drugs are equally effective in treating a leading cause of blindness in the elderly, one costing patients $60 per treatment and the other $2,000?
In the case of Genentech Inc., nothing.
The company declined to seek federal approval for the cheaper drug, Avastin, to treat the wet form of age-related macular degeneration. Nor would it help finance _ or cooperate with _ a National Eye Institute study comparing the effectiveness and safety of Avastin, a cancer drug, and the more expensive eye drug, Lucentis.
Study outcome won't sway company on eye drug
A federal judge Wednesday overturned as unconstitutional a North Dakota law banning abortions as early as...
Hundreds of millions of pounds may have been wasted on a drug for flu that works...
Researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health are calling attention to a new study...
