But when Vilsack announced the plan last week, he called it "a strong framework to restore and manage our forests and watersheds and help deliver countless benefits to the American people." The plan is being published Friday in the Federal Register.
Conservationists say the wildlife provision is a crucial weak point.
"This plan is much less protective than the 1982 Reagan-era one on wildlife protection," said Niel Lawrence, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council. "This provision is the single strongest protection for the national forests, and the agency is not retaining it."
The 1982 rule required the Forest Service to manage fish and wildlife habitat so that healthy populations of animals are "well-distributed" throughout each forest.
The new plan drops that language. Instead, it requires forest managers to maintain habitats. It leaves it up to the official in charge of a region's forests to decide whether any individual species needs extra protection to ensure that it will continue to exist over the long term with "sufficient distribution."
More...
On May 24, the Ohio’s State Assembly passed Senate Bill 315—one of the worst fracking laws...
Across the vast Pacific, the mighty bluefin tuna carried radioactive contamination that leaked from Japan's crippled...
Pacific bluefin tuna migrating last year from coastal Japan to the waters off Southern California contained...
Florida's top state wetlands expert has been suspended after she refused to issue a permit on...
