TV News LIES

Monday, May 05th

Last update07:29:55 AM GMT

You are here News Editorials How America's Security-Industrial Complex Went Insane

How America's Security-Industrial Complex Went Insane

E-mail Print PDF

If no one knows if our security-industrial complex is making us safer, why have we built it? Why are we still building it, at breakneck speed?

Here at home, according to an exhaustive and impressive two-year-long investigation by the Washington Post, the taxpayer-funded Global War on Terror also built enough ultra-high-security office space (Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facilities, or SCIF, in bureaucrat-speak) to fill twenty-two US Capitol Buildings: seventeen million square feet of offices in thirty-three handsome and generously funded new complexes powered up twenty-four hours a day, where an army of nearly one million American professionals spies on the world and the homeland. It’s as if we turned the entire working population of Detroit and Milwaukee into high-security-clearance spooks and analysts.

The spy boom has been a beautiful windfall for architects, construction companies, IT specialists, and above all defense contractors, enriching thousands of private companies and dozens of local economies hugging the Capital Beltway. All those SCIFs and the rest of the government-contractor gravy train have made suburban Washington, DC, home to six of the ten wealthiest counties in America. Falls Church, Loudoun County, and Fairfax County in Virginia are one, two, and three. Goodbye, Nassau County, New York. Take that, Oyster Bay.

Our constitutional inheritance didn’t point us in this direction. If the colonists hadn’t rejected British militarism and the massive financial burden of maintaining the British military, America wouldn’t exist. The Constitutional Convention debated whether America should even have a standing army. The founders feared that maintaining one would drain our resources in the same way that maintaining the eighteenth-century British military had burdened the colonies. They worried that a powerful military could rival civilian government for power in our new country, and of course they worried that having a standing army around would create too much of a temptation to use it. Those worries about the inevitable incentives to war were part of what led to the division of government at the heart of our Constitution, building into the structure of our new country a deliberate peaceable bias.

More...


Most Recent Related Stories...


The Guardian view on Israel’s aid blockade of Gaza: hunger as a weapon of war

Starvation as a weapon of war,Shameful. That was the word that Gideon Sa’ar, Israel’s foreign minister, used to describe proceedings at...

Peter Beinart: As Jews celebrate Purim, let us end the slaughter in Gaza committed in our name

Beinart editorial Later this month, on the holiday of Purim, Jewish people will dress in silly costumes, eat...

The North Dakota ruling against Greenpeace is a threat to free speech

ND prohibits Greenpeace supportThe first amendment guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. It will have little meaning...

The Bombs of August : In Remembrance of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Enola Gay crewOn Monday, August 6, 1945, after six months of intense firebombing of 67 other Japanese cities,...
 
America's # 1 Enemy
Tee Shirt
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
TVNL Tee Shirt
 
TVNL TOTE BAG
Conserve our Planet
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
Get your 9/11 & Media
Deception Dollars
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
The Loaded Deck
The First & the Best!
The Media & Bush Admin Exposed!