From Press Corps to Press Corpse
During the early 1970s the American Press emerged as the global leader in integrity. Press corps from around the world stood in awe of the fact that the American Press held its Government and President accountable for their actions. Between CBS Newsâ airing of what is now referred to as âThe Pentagon Papersâ, and the investigative reporting by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of the Washington Post, exposing the Watergate Scandal, the world became aware of the power of âFreedom of the Pressâ. It was the press corps that held the government accountable, at least to an extent.
The International Community watched with amazement, respect and jealously as the American Press exposed corruption at highest levels in the American Government. Responsible honest reporting of events, without spin, resulted in a change of leadership in the greatest most powerful nation on the Planet.
During this period in American history the bulk of the news was reported in print. The Watergate Scandal spawned out of a tiny article about a little break in at the Watergate Hotel.
Journalism was more than a vocation, it was a calling. Those of us that have had the pleasure of meeting journalist and photo journalists understand this. There is an underlying dedication to the implied responsibility of informing the public of the events of the world.
How did a press corps that used to hold presidents accountable get Bushwhacked? Today the American Press has become the laughing stock of the world. No longer are they looked at with the respect their predecessors worked so hard to earn. I speak mainly of the Mass Media, not of the fine dedicated small publications that are available to those who seek them out. The American Press is all but a complete failure today.
Unfortunately today a mask has been placed over the face of the American journalists, and a filter has been applied to their voice.
You want proof of a filter you say?
How is it that in a world with thousands of stories to be reported during any given moment, the same stories are reported by virtually every mass media outlet? Regarding television media, not only are the same stories reported, but they are reported in the same sequence! How is this mathematically possible? The odds of this occurring once between 2 television news âentertainmentâ networks is astronomical, yet it happens among virtually all of the hundreds of local and national television news âentertainmentâ programs every single day.
What do I mean by a âMaskâ?
The face of the news has changed. Todayâs TV News âEntertainmentâ personalities are just that, personalities. They are faces, mostly attractive faces, or faces that seem trustworthy, hired only to draw your attention. A new trend is taking place that proves how important the âFaceâ factor is. The new trend is the hiring of women broadcasters who have exceptionally expressive faces. The purpose of this is to impress upon the viewer an inappropriately heightened sense of horror or concern as the broadcaster reports a story. You can compare this effect to the subliminal response of an infant who has not yet learned to understand words; the infant responds emotionally to an adults face. When an infant hears a noise, or falls down, if the adult laughs there is more of a chance of the infant not being frightened by what just happens, however if the adult responds with fear or worry, the infant takes itâs cue and believes that there is something to worry about. The latter commonly results in a crying infant. This response is similar in adults. An example might be that someone in a room says something a bit harsh or outrageous, and it catches you off guard. You donât quite know what to make of it. You immediately look around. You see the person who made the comment. You can tell, simply by the facial expression as to the intention of the comment, you will know if it was a joke, or if it was serious. Your emotions follow the personâs expression regardless of actually knowing the true intent of the comment. The personâs expression is not necessarily a true indication of the personâs true intent, but the expression helped to cast your emotion none the less.