A key appellate court on Friday concluded prisoners held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan cannot challenge their captivity through rights granted under the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that Yemeni native Fadi al Maqaleh and two other men did not enjoy the same habeas rights previously extended by the Supreme Court to Guantanamo Bay detainees.
Citing geographic and other differences between the air base in Afghanistan and the naval base in Cuba, the three-judge panel overturned a trial court's conclusion that the Bagram detainees were constitutionally similar to those held in Guantanamo.
"Guantanamo Bay is a territory that, while technically not a part of the United States, is under the complete and total control of our government," Judge David Sentelle wrote. At Bagram, he added, "the surrounding circumstances are hardly the same."
More...
The United States has criticised its allies for failing to stop a Gaza-bound aid flotilla that...
According to the Global Sumud Flotilla aid mission, at least 15 boats were raided, with those...
Six transgender Idahoans filed a federal lawsuit on Wednesday challenging the state’s new bathroom law, which...
After hours spent carefully preparing her cakes, Abrar Abdu stood stunned in silence before her oven. In...
