Those of us who choose to drink ''raw’’ milk are a tiny minority – barely more than 100,000 – so why is time and money being wasted trying to stop us?
This is baffling. If there were widespread and regular food poisoning outbreaks linked directly to drinking raw milk, then the industry as a whole would undoubtedly suffer, and the eccentrics who insist on milk au naturel ought, probably, to be saved from themselves.
But according to FSA figures, not one outbreak has been reported since 2002. Before that, the FSA says, illness due to unpasteurised milk accounted for a ''small proportion’’ of the total number of food-borne outbreaks between 1992 and 2002. I think we can say that raw milk has become a safer, not riskier, product over the intervening years.
In the article Iowa Women’s Health Study, much of the piece takes many things that are...
The first goal of the Paul Amendment is to reign in FDA overreach in regulating dietary...
To reasonable people it makes a whole lot of sense that the act of pumping tons...
In a medical science first, researchers turned skin cells from heart failure patients into heart muscle...
