 Amid the wave of excitement among conservative organizers over the prospect of reversing access to abortion for the first time in nearly 50 years -- since Roe v. Wade affirmed a constitutional right to the procedure in 1973 -- there are  growing fears about how the conservative legal movement will fare if its  own appointees on the bench stop short of dismantling the landmark  abortion ruling.
Amid the wave of excitement among conservative organizers over the prospect of reversing access to abortion for the first time in nearly 50 years -- since Roe v. Wade affirmed a constitutional right to the procedure in 1973 -- there are  growing fears about how the conservative legal movement will fare if its  own appointees on the bench stop short of dismantling the landmark  abortion ruling.
"There  are a lot of conservatives who will wash their hands of the whole  enterprise if conservatives don't come out the right way on these  cases," said Mike Davis, a Senate Judiciary Committee aide who founded  the Article III Project, a conservative judicial advocacy group.
The  mounting concerns among social conservative stakeholders and  anti-abortion activists -- which come as two abortion-related cases are  set to be decided by the Supreme Court in the coming months -- stem from  a series of episodes where Republican-appointed justices have sided  with their liberal counterparts in cases involving LGBTQ rights, the  Affordable Care Act and religious liberty -- blindsiding conservative  groups that helped shepherd them through the Senate confirmation process  and sparking tense debates inside the conservative movement over the  vetting process of nominees.
