The New York appeals court said in a written opinion Thursday that the judge in Weinstein's 2020 case, James Burke, admitted testimony from women with allegations that were not a part of the case − known as Molineux witnesses − but rather "irrelevant, prejudicial, and untested allegations of prior bad acts."
This "error" was exacerbated when the judge ruled that the former Hollywood producer could be cross-examined regarding these allegations and others, which depicted Weinstein in a "prejudicial light."
"Under our system of justice, the accused has a right to be held to account only for the crime charged and, thus, allegations of prior bad acts may not be admitted against them for the sole purpose of establishing" a tendency for criminal acts, the court's majority opinion states.
Six of the nine Native American tribes in South Dakota have voted to ban Republican Gov....
Kristi Noem, the South Dakota governor who was once considered one of Donald Trump’s top vice-presidential...
The Wisconsin supreme court appeared prepared on Monday to overturn a ruling banning the use of...
Three people were killed and at least 12 were wounded Saturday night in a shooting at...
